I’m working on improving our seedling search protocol, using perhaps photography, a physical grid, or some combination of things. Here’s a couple photos I took to test out a locating device: toothpick plus coffee stirrer plus thumbtack. The first photo is in easier short foliage conditions and has two red markers and a blue marker somewhere in the 1m diameter circle marked by the meter sticks. The second photo is in more difficult high foliage and has two red, a blue, and a white. All are visible in both pictures, but perhaps not immediately apparent. Happy hunting!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f553e/f553e2dfd2beb3bd80e85a590954f69a8f963834" alt="Share on Twitter twitter"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25fc8/25fc8934a94293aba10bb8b27d59e0f0d3e018d3" alt="Pin it with Pinterest pinterest"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1dbe/d1dbe276f8e0f2083ba624d3d9c32bc2998f6b4d" alt="Share by email mail"
Ben, Those are really difficult to find! I wonder if bigger markers would help–maybe something the size of a return address label. Would black text on a white background stand out?
Here’s the paper that I recommended:
Booth D.T., Cox S.E., Louhaichi M. & Johnson D.E. (2004). Technical Note: Lightweight Camera Stand for Close-to-Earth Remote Sensing. Rangeland Ecology and Management. 57: 675-678.
SW
I wonder if a red-eye algorithm would find the red markers? I think so. But would anybody care?
I care.
Ben is trying to develop techniques and protocols to make refinding tiny seedlings faster and easier. Currently we make paper maps, which are time-consuming and not always accurate.
Digital photos might help and using or developing an algorithm that will find the pixel coordinates of the red markers in a digital image might be a huge benefit to the project.